Medical Malpractice: Three Myths That Cost Your Hospital Millions

What's the use?seems to be the logical course of action.
Nothing you do will hold down the cost of medicalThey keep the physician from the patient and
malpractice. It feels that way sometimes, doesn't it?withhold information. Sometimes they even mislead
Unfortunately, for many risk managers, that's not toopatients. All of which fuels the patients' feeling of
far off the mark. What they're doing isn't working.having been wronged.
We can point to other industries, greedy lawyers,So what can you do?
insurance companies trying to make up for losses inEquip your staff, particularly your physicians and risk
the stock market. But there's trouble within medicalmanagers, to treat patients with empathy and
practices too.respect. Even if they threaten to sue. Especially if
A study published in the Archives of Internal Medicinethey threaten to sue.
showed that many of the actions risk managers takeThe Harvard School of Public Health will tell you that
actually backfire(1). They create more risk and driveif your aim is to prevent liability loss, you may have
up costs.more success communicating well and showing
The problem is not the risk managers. It's mythspatients you value them than you will by reducing
about medical malpractice that dominate theactual cases of malpractice
healthcare industry. Three myths in particular areOf course, that's easier said than done. There are
common and costly.two reasons.
Myth #1: Medical negligence causes medicalFirst, it's stressful being face-to-face with someone
malpractice claims.who's upset. Most people intend to be open. But
What could be more logical?they're afraid it would make matters worse.
It's a conclusion based on common sense and backedSecond, though most medical staff are
by data from two large studies carried out bycompassionate, they don't know how to express
Harvard researchers over the past 20 years.that empathy in a way an upset patient can see.
One percent of hospital visits end in medicalInstead, they try to fix the problem or show the
negligence. And the injured one percent are 20 timespatient the right way of thinking. Which does make
more likely to claim medical malpractice than are thematters worse.
other 99 percent.My advice? Your best course of action is to get out
So patients injured through error must driveahead of the problem. Train your staff to identify
malpractice claims, right? Wrong.patient feelings and needs, and negotiate solutions.
A recent report from researchers at the HarvardSo patients feel no need to make claims in the first
School of Public Health(2) revealed that four of fiveplace.
patients who file medical malpractice claims have notIf that seems like a lot to bite off. Here are some
been injured through negligence. And the greatsuggestions to get you started.
majority of patients who have suffered negligentTrain selected staff. Risk management, security
injury don't sue.services, and social work, work often with upset
Myth #2: Medical malpractice claims are random actspatients. Focus on staff in these areas to leverage a
If medical error doesn't drive malpractice claims, whatlimited training budget or to model the skills for other
does? Maybe claims are entirely unpredictable.employees.
They're not though. Injured patients are 20 timesTrain selected departments. Some departments,
more likely to sue than are patients who aren'tobstetrics and neurology for example, attract medical
injured. And there are correlations that are farmalpractice suits.
stronger that we'll discuss in a minute.In the case of medical malpractice, the best defense
Myth #3: Medical malpractice claims are filed byis not a good offense. It's good collaboration. Your
opportunistic patientsgoal is to uncover your patients' needs and negotiate
Undoubtedly some are. I've heard from risksolutions that meet their needs as well as the needs
managers, especially in economically depressed areas,of your hospital. And do it in a way your patients can
who feel the pinch from patients who literally fall insee.
the parking lot. Personal anecdotes like these though__________________
can be misleading.1. Reducing legal risk by practicing patient-centered
According to Beckman and colleagues in the Archivesmedicine, Heidi P Forster, Jack Schwartz, Evan
of Internal Medicine(3), the reality is that mostDeRenzo. Archives of Internal Medicine. Chicago: Jun
patients sue because of emotional errors. They feel10, 2002. Vol. 162, Iss. 11; pg. 1217, 3 pgs
deserted, feel their views were devaluated, feel that2. Medical malpractice as an epidemiological problem,
information was delivered poorly, and feel theirSocial Science & Medicine, Volume 59, Issue 1, July
physician failed to understand their perspective.2004, Pages 39-46, Michelle M. Mello and David
And this is why the strategies pursued by many riskHemenway
managers backfire. They've been led to believe that3. Beckman HB, Markakis KM, Suchman AL, Frankel
opportunistic patients take advantage of errors andRM. The doctor-patient relationship and malpractice:
negligence as an opening to sue. So they follow whatlessons from plaintiff depositions. Arch Intern Med.