| We often run into providers who are having serious | | | | name. The provider keeps the individual or Type I |
| issues with their medical insurance billing that all stem | | | | NPI to identify themselves as the rendering provider |
| back to billing under both an EIN# and their social | | | | but uses the Type II NPI for billing purposes. An |
| security # as identifying tax information. Most people | | | | individual or Type I NPI cannot be used with an EIN# |
| think it's not a big deal, and how messed up can it | | | | and a legal business name. |
| get. But you would be amazed at how much a | | | | When billing insurance claims the correct information |
| providers income can be affected by the billing not | | | | must appear in the correct locations. For example, |
| being submitted correctly regarding the tax ID# that | | | | the individual NPI must be in the rendering physician |
| is submitted to the insurance carriers. With NPI | | | | box (24J on the CMS form) and the type II or group |
| numbers now in the picture, the confusion has grown. | | | | NPI must be in the provider billing information (33A on |
| It was very common for a provider to have begun | | | | the CMS form). The EIN# must be in box 25 on the |
| their practice years ago and to have started out | | | | CMS form with the EIN box checked. But just having |
| billing under their social security number. Many did this | | | | the information in the right boxes does not ensure |
| because it was just easier. They figured they could | | | | claims will be processed that way. The insurance |
| switch over to an EIN# number later on, when their | | | | carriers must also have this information on their |
| practice was bigger. The problem is that switching | | | | provider files this way as well. |
| from a social security number to an EIN number is | | | | We have had many providers who have switched |
| not a simple task and it usually freaks your | | | | from their social security number to an EIN# number |
| accountant out. Actually, the problem is that the | | | | somewhere along the line and cannot figure out why |
| accountant doesn't understand that it is a problem | | | | the are not getting payments. Many times when we |
| with the insurance carriers and they switch them | | | | look into the problem we find that they are billing |
| over without advising them. The accountant tells the | | | | under their tax EIN# but they are enrolled with the |
| provider it's no big deal to switch, when it is. | | | | insurance carrier under their social security number. |
| When a provider changes any information regarding | | | | When claims are submitted under the EIN# they are |
| their practice they must notify all insurance carriers | | | | either processed out of network or denied. So if you |
| using the required method of each insurance carrier. | | | | have a provider who is receiving a lot of unexplained |
| When changing tax ID information, many commercial | | | | denials, or claims are being processed out of network |
| carriers require that new contracts be signed. Even | | | | when they are participating, you may want to see if |
| though the provider may have been in network with | | | | they have switched to a tax ID number recently. |
| an insurance carrier for years, when switching to an | | | | That may be the whole problem. Whether billing |
| EIN# it is as if it is an entirely new provider. Medicare | | | | under a social security number or a tax ID/EIN |
| requires that the appropriate CMS forms be | | | | number, it is important to make sure you are billing |
| completed. In any case, the switch must be reported | | | | the way it is set up in the insurance carrier's system |
| using the appropriate format. | | | | or you can experience major problems with your |
| In addition to switching to a EIN#, the provider must | | | | insurance claims causing your accounts receivable to |
| also obtain a group, or Type II NPI number to | | | | get out of control. |
| correspond with the tax ID number and business | | | | |