Remarkable Project Managers - The Roeblings

p>The first project manager we visited in this seriesbase is too technically complex for me to explain
was General Leslie Richard Groves, the projecthere. Just bear in mind that this was all unexplored
manager responsible for the successful completion ofterritory for bridge building, Roebling and his team had
the Manhattan project. For our next remarkableto improvise these solutions on the fly, without
project manager we're going to go back a littlehaving an opportunity to prove his methods with
further in time to the period just after the Americanpilots. If you're interested in the technique that
Civil War when the Brooklyn Bridge was built, directlyRoebling used to sink his towers, there is a great
connecting Brooklyn with Manhattan. In those days,article in the Catskill Archives on the subject. Just visit
Brooklyn was the suburbs and Manhattan was thetheir website at:
business district so most people had to cross theThe construction of the towers above the water line
East River to get to work. Up until the bridgeswas a much simpler process and the first tower was
completion in 1883, people crossed the East River incompleted in May of 1875 and the second was
ferries; fine in the summertime but more problematicfinished in July of 1876. The next challenge was the
in wintertime when ice could stop the ferries. By 1867cables that transfer the weight of a suspension
New Yorkers had had enough inconvenience andbridge to its towers.
called on the New York Bridge Company to putWashington Roebling fell ill at this time to health
together plans for a bridge. The New York Bridgeissues stemming from what divers call "the bends".
Company assigned a senior engineer to the project,The bends are caused by nitrogen bubbles in the
John A. Roebling, and made him responsible for theblood that don't dissolve as a diver returns to the
plans and the project.surface of the water too quickly. Compressed air
The Brooklyn Bridge took 16 years to build (fromwas used to keep the water from flowing into the
project initiation to completion) and our story spanscaissons as the digging proceeded to the river
two generations of Roeblings - John and Washington,bottom. The use of the compressed air duplicated
father and son. John Roebling died as a result of anthe problems that divers have when making deeper
injury he suffered while supervising the project workdives. We know now that a limit to the time a diver
in 1869. His foot was crushed by a ferry as he wasspends at depth and a slow ascent are the two key
fixing the location of the first tower and he died 16strategies to defend against the bends, but this
days later of lockjaw. His son, Washington Roebling,knowledge wasn't prevalent at the time Roebling was
took over the project and completed it. At the timebuilding the bridge. Although Washington Roebling was
the bridge was built, it was customary for theincapacitated, he enlisted the help of his wife to act
engineer who designed a structure to takeas lieutenant. Mrs. Roebling studied mathematics and
responsibility of managing the project which built it.engineering until she was able to carry Roebling's
The Roeblings were not only remarkable and forwardinstructions to the work site and oversee their
thinking engineers (the design and many technicalimplementation through project engineers. He never
innovations were the father's ideas), they werecompletely recovered from his case of the bends,
remarkable, persevering, and effective projectsuffering ill effects from it for the rest of his life.
managers. This article focuses on the projectRoebling was lucky; fires, explosions, and the bends
management aspect of this project, but becausewould take the lives of 20 workers before the
Roebling senior was actually responsible for the plan,caissons were completed.
we give credit to both.Roebling made use of another significant innovation in
The construction of a bridge over such a long spanconstructing the bridge: steel for the 4 massive
(remember this was 1867) was the first technicalcables that support the bridge. These 4 cables run
challenge that had to be overcome. The bridge has afrom both sides of the river and over the two
total span of 6,016 feet and a main span length oftowers. Up to that time no-one had ever used steel
1,595.5 feet. To put this challenge into perspective, itto create cables for suspension bridges, they used
was not until 1890 that a bridge with a longer mainiron. Roebling was constructing a longer, heavier
span was built over the Firth of Forth in Scotland.bridge than had been constructed to that point and
The technical challenges are the most interestingknew (or suspected) that iron would not be strong
aspect for the technical crowd, but the Roeblingsenough to suit the purpose. He bucked conventional
also faced political challenges and safety challenges.wisdom, and the project budget, and chose to
The political challenges were mainly caused by theconstruct the cables from steel. As to whether iron
fact that the bridge started in one municipality andcables would have been sufficient, we'll never know
finished in another so the Roeblings were faced withbut we do know that Roebling's steel cables were.
satisfying two key stakeholders with sometimesThe bridge was initially designed for foot traffic,
competing interests. Further challenges were providedhorse drawn traffic, and trains. The trains would run
by increasing jealousy from competing engineeringon two elevated tracks, the horse drawn traffic on
firms. The project started with a budget offour lanes below, and the foot paths were on an
$7,000,000 (excluding land) which was a huge sum inelevated promenade above the train tracks. The two
those days. As the project moved forward thetrain tracks meant the bridge had to be constructed
budget gradually increased to $12,000,000. Safety atto carry heavy loads so each cable was constructed
construction sites doesn't become a major issue untilto carry a maximum of 11,200 tons. Each cable was
a completely new and untried approach to building is15" in diameter and consisted of 19 strands containing
used for the first time. Inventing the technical solutiona total of 5,434 individual wires! Roebling used vertical
is one challenge. Now find a solution that producescables suspended from the 4 main cables to suspend
the deliverable that can be performed safely!the bridge and then added stiffening trusses to make
Another problem faced by Roebling was the financingthe bridge wind proof.
of the bridge. The financing came from a ratherConstruction of the bridge proper began in 1879 after
complex set of subscriptions from both municipalcompletion of the two towers and rigging of the 4
governments and private industry. Financing was notmain cables. By 1883 the bridge was completed and
always received according to the project plan whichready for its grand opening. Though Washington
not only made completion of the project to any sortRoebling was unable to attend, his wife represented
of schedule difficult, it also increased the cost of thethe Roebling interests and officially opened the bridge.
project.The project was to have one last brush with tragedy
John Roebling was assigned the project in May ofthat day. A lady pedestrian ascending the stairs to
1867 and submitted his plans, surveys, and estimatesthe walkway tripped and fell, screaming as she did.
for the bridge in September of that year. The plansHer screams set off a panic amongst the rest of the
were turned over to a team of consulting engineerspedestrians on the bridge who thought her screams
provided by the army. The consulting engineers werewere an indication the bridge was in trouble. In the
engaged to ensure the plans were properly done andensuing panic, 12 people were killed and 35 seriously
that the project was feasible. The consultinginjured.
engineers approved Roebling's plans with one minorThe Roeblings, father and son, not only exhibited a
modification, that the height be increased by 5 feetremarkable degree of engineering skill in designing and
to a height of 135 feet, to ensure that marine trafficengineering the longest suspension bridge to have
would not be interfered with. Work commenced onbeen built to that date, they also exhibited a
the bridge on January 3, 1870. Unfortunately Johnremarkable degree of project management skill in
was not around to see work start on his project asseeing the project through to the end. Let's take a
he died the previous year but the work was passedlook at a few of their project management
off to his son, another engineer, who had beenaccomplishments:
involved in one capacity or another from the outset.- Planning the project The Roeblings planned the
Washington Roebling received the first changesuccessful completion of, what to that point was the
request for the project before work had actuallylongest suspension bridge. The plan was solid as
started. In the world of bridge construction yourproven by its successful execution.
customers can easily understand the impact of asking- Customer management Don't forget that the
for a doubling in the bridges size after 80% of theRoebling's had two individual municipal governments to
work is completed. The change request was tosatisfy. These governments did not necessarily share
increase the carrying capacity of the bridge toa common set of interests, and when they did share
anticipate future demand. This change was estimateda common interest, such as limiting the money spent
by Roebling to cost an additional 8% over the originalon the bridge, these interests were not always in the
budget. The additional cost was accepted, thebest interests of the project. The Roeblings
change accepted and Roebling changed the bridgepersevered through the times when money was
plans accordingly. The next change originated withtight and succeeded in securing sufficient budget to
the project: it was determined that the original planbuild the bridge the way they knew it should be built.
to use pilings as foundations for the twin towers of- Managing Change There were several sources of
the bridge was not feasible, the foundations wouldchange during construction of the bridge. Some came
need to rest on bedrock which was 78 feet belowfrom the stakeholders of the project, such as the
grade on the one side and 45 feet on the other.increase in scope of the bridge to handle an
The first project phase involved creating the twoanticipated increase in traffic, or the increase in the
towers that form the structural base of the bridge.minimum required height, and others came from the
As mentioned, these towers are not only below theproject such as the change from iron cables to steel.
water (approx. 80 feet) but between 45 and 80 feetThe Roeblings handled the changes well, rejecting
below the river bed because they have to be set onchanges that did not add value to the project and
solid bedrock rather than on pilings because of theimplementing the ones which did with a minimum of
tremendous weight they bear. The problem to bedisruption to deliverables and schedules. The
solved was how to dig an 80 foot hole 80 feetRoeblings were particularly adept at dealing with the
underwater? The solution Roebling chose wasupsets that the bridge financing threw their way. The
caissons. Caissons are water tight structures thatbridge was 90% funded by Brooklyn and Manhattan
carry workers who do the excavating. The caissons(New York) and 10% funded by private capital. The
are lowered into the water until they rest on theRoeblings survived a stock manipulation scandal,
river bottom. Compressed air is then pumped into thenumerous budget increases, and the threat of a
caisson to create a breathable atmosphere. Thediscontinuation of funding altogether and still delivered
inspiration for this solution came from the diving bellthe project.
which was the submersible of its day. The diving bell- Lessons Learned/Corrective Action/Changing the
worked on the same principal: a diver was locked inPlan Washington Roebling learned from mistakes on
the bell; compressed air pumped in then the diverthe Brooklyn Bridge project, and other projects, took
was lowered into the water.corrective action when needed and did not hesitate
The caissons used for the Brooklyn bridge towerto make changes to the plan when it was clear to
were constructed of wood calked with pitch andhim that they were warranted. A good example of
lined with steel and fit the footprint of the bottom ofhis ability to learn quickly and avoid unnecessary
the tower, 102 feet by 172 feet, plus 11 feet onmistakes on the project was his use of compressed
each side. This massive structure was lowered intoair to enable work at the bottom of the deep
the water until it rested on the bottom, and then thecaissons. The technology was fairly new but was in
construction workers began excavation of the riveruse at the time in diving bells. Washington Roebling
bottom. When they had reached the bedrock 80adapted the technology to his purpose to enable the
feet (or 45 feet depending on which tower wasmen to work in the caissons. Keep in mind that as
being worked on) they began the construction of thethe men excavated the silt at the bottom of the
actual tower which then rested on the caisson.caissons the water would want to rush in the
Manual excavation would have taken forever andopening this created. The compressed air served to
there were no machines which they could lower withkeep that water out.
the caisson which could do the job so Roebling- Managing the Risks The first risk to be managed
decided to use dynamite to speed the process.during the construction of the bridge were the risks
Imagine the combination he was dealing with here.to the workers' safety. Although the record shows
The interior of the caisson had to be lit so thethat 20 workers died while working on the bridge,
workers could see what they were doing and thethe fatalities all occurred around the building of the
only light available at the time was gas light. Thecaissons, a new venture. Mitigation strategies were
atmosphere in the caisson was charged withimplemented in an attempt to avoid accidents, such
compressed air and, to top it all off, the caisson wasas the lining of the wooden caissons with iron but the
constructed from wood! Not what I would call a safecombination of compressed air, open flame and
working environment and, in fact, explosions and firesexplosives were clearly more than this strategy could
did happen. That's why Roebling had the caissonsdeal with. Other project risks, which could be better
lined with steel to protect the wood and pitch frompredicted, based on other bridge projects and other
open flame.municipal projects were well mitigated. An example of
Once the caissons reached bedrock, cement wasthose risks and mitigation strategies is the risk of a
hydraulically inserted beneath its floor to provide astress fracture in any of the steel trusses or girders
solid, level platform for the tower and then theused to build the bridge. The mitigation strategy used
platform was built in place using the caissons as itswas the testing of samples of all the components
foundation. The process that Roebling devised tousing a hydraulic press.
build the tower in place and sink it onto the caisson