Operational Risk Management Awareness

The term Operational Risk Management (ORM) is notreporting of those losses, affect virtually all areas of
new. It has been tossed about in businesses acrossevery business each and every day. Therefore, it is
North America for the last several years. ORM andin each company's best interest to simultaneously find
the oft associated term Enterprise Risk Managementways to cut losses while keeping regulatory
(ERM) have generally been used as corporatecompliance costs down. Hence the rebirth of
buzzwords, business culture idioms referenced inOperational Risk Management/Enterprise Risk
board meetings and articulated during presentations.Management and the new demand for Risk
Recent developments, such as the creation of theManagement software solutions.
Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act in 2002 in response toTraditionally, few operational losses were measured in
growing financial scandals in the U.S., have broughtany accounting system, and rarely were the loss
Operational Risk Management, Enterprise Riskincidents tracked and analyzed in any way; the time
Management and related concepts from theand paperwork required to do so was simply
backrooms to the forefront of corporate America.daunting. Because there was no standard legislation in
The inescapable reality is that every single dayplace, any Risk Management software tools were
businesses incur losses and experience operationaloften proprietary and slightly more than electronic log
disruptions due to failures by employees, incorrectbooks at best. New technologies and attitudes have
implementation of processes and technologies as wellallowed loss incidents to be seen as more predictable
as wilful disobedience to internal controls. Theseand able to be grouped into risk categories. Proper
losses may be manifest in the form of uncollectibleanalysis of these incidents can result in attribution to
receivables from disappointed clients, lost sales dueroot causes which aids in mitigation. Even this
to call centre failures or unproductive employeebeginning leads to dramatically reduced costs while
downtime when computer systems are unavailable,achieving huge gains and strategic advantages from
or a host of other potential problems. While mostwell crafted Operational Risk Management policies and
businesses have developed ad hoc methods ofEnterprise Risk Management procedures.
dealing with such losses in the past, legislation (suchChanges in legislation, technology and attitudes
as SOX and the Basel Accord) has maderelated to ORM/ERM have produced not just
standardized compliance procedures much moreeconomic gains, they have led directly to
complex. Thankfully, just as these new rules havere-invigorated business innovation and even created
given rise to increased awareness of ORM/ERM, newimprovements in the quality of life. For example,
tools (including Risk Management software) havesafety, quality and environmental related loss
been developed to aid compliance efforts.incidents have proven to be not only manageable and
The new regime of Sarbanes-Oxley, under theavoidable, but sound management of these issues
direction of the Public Company Accounting Oversighthas conferred greater advantage on those who
Board (PCAOB) which is in turn accountable to thesucceeded while driving many who did not adapt out
Security and Exchange Commission (SEC), hasof business. While large scale corruption may have
undoubtedly benefited the business world bybrought about regulatory changes, these changes
providing a foundation from which to decreasehave spurred a re-visioning of Enterprise Risk
corporate fraud. However, the complexity andManagement. Advanced Risk Management software
associated technical, labour and administrative costshas allowed business to more directly mitigate losses.
posed to business is also considerable. The realities ofThis has resulted in a cleaner, more efficient and
both individually large and collectively mundane errorsmore competitive business environment.
resulting in loss, as well as the newly regulated