Bridging the Management GAP in Escalating Insurance Claims

While insurance fraud schemes have evolved overfrom a nearby fishing vessel. In fact, the next
time to fit within the circumstances of modernmorning the masts of the ship were still visible from
society, the foundation of them has been in place forthe shoreline. In the end, the Captain was prosecuted
centuries….for his actions and hanged. The shipowners however,
Insurance fraud is one of the real threats facing thewere neither prosecuted nor fined.
industry. The growth of the claims culture, togetherThe earliest recorded life insurance fraud a case of
with research shows consumers believe insurers arepretended death comes from England in the 1730's. A
‘fair-game’, making for a dangerousfather and daughter staged a succession of schemes
combination. The costs to manage these claims comein which the daughter appeared to convulse, with
with a risk factor; bad faith suits, medical expense,heart spasms then go limp in apparent death. While
investigation expense to name but a few. Thethe father stood by in convincing grief. These
utilization of third party providers to assist inschemes traveled from England to America and
managing these claims has opened the door to theeventually with the advent of automobiles that we
added risk of provider fraud. The cost to thebegan to see related injury claims. Today the same
industry is enormous and affects the way the publicschemes exist, though the mediums have changed. In
view insurance companies and their service offerings.a nutshell resourceful individuals have been quick to
MetLife director of special investigations, Johnseize opportunities to steal money from insurers in
Sargent stated in an article “that eliminatingjust about every imaginable means.
fraud is an unachievable goal”. But that hasn'tInsurance fraud comes in many different flavors,
stopped his company or other industry leaders fromranging from isolated crimes of opportunity to
trying. "Our goal is to pay what we owe, and not asophisticated organized schemes. While it is unrealistic
penny more or a penny less," Sargent says. "Theto expect insurers to eradicate fraud in its entirety, it
more efficient we are at identifying and preventingis however, realistic for insurers to reduce their
fraud, the better we can be at writing business at aexposure to this multi billion dollar a year industry
more competitive rate."Time for Change
Insurance fraud costs Canadian policyholders over $1Fraud Investigations are being scaled down, on the
billion each year. To the average Canadian citizen,basis that it is reactive rather than proactive. Fraud
that means at least 10 percent of their totalhas to be beaten by a more strategic approach,
insurance premiums are used to cover the cost ofinvolving consumers, employers and claims handlers.
fraud.http//:The fraud problem in insurance relies heavily in the
There is nothing new about fraudulent insuranceskills and effort of the insurer and their agents to
claims or in the way they are adjudicated. The highuncover and manage fraud.
cost of insurance fraud is passed on to the consumerLack-lustre investigations will not result in a dossier
and therefore, creates a situation where the industrythat is effective as evidence in a court. To discharge
might fail to seek a better solution to combating it.the burden of proof in a criminal trial, insurers need to
We've seen insurance claims directors reduce theprovide evidence to convince a magistrate or jury
numbers of claim handlers in order to 'contain costs',beyond all reasonable doubt of any guilt. In civil cases,
frustration amongst investigators when insurersthe usual standard of proof is on a balance of
exhort them to reduce fee's, and then make aprobabilities, in fraud cases there is a very high
"commercial decision" to pay unnecessary claims.degree of probability. The costs associated with
These cost cutting solutions are not andinvestigating fraud come with additional risks which
haven’t been effective, instead insurers needcould lead to reputational damage and loss of public
to re-focus on reducing claims before they becomeconfidence. This is an area of cost management that
costly and problematic.requires review and reconstruction.
The History of Insurance FraudTo help reduce claims related costs and reserves,
While insurance fraud schemes have evolved overinsurers need to become more proactive than
time to fit within the circumstances of modernreactive, to unjust claims and provider fraud. Being
society, the foundation of them has been in place forproactive requires a good understanding of the root
centuries. For example, one of the earliest fraudcause. The root cause associated with fraudulent
schemes involved the purposeful sinking of ships,claims begins long before the claim is submitted and
otherwise known as “ship scuttling”. Onecan be traced to human behavioral traits. The lack of
of the first incidents of ship scuttling was recorded inunderstanding by employers or empathy by claims
ancient Greece. The problem became increasinglypersonnel coupled with a lack of good communication
worse, and by the early 1700's ship scuttling becamebetween, H.R, claims and investigators can a create a
so prevalent that England passed one of the strictestGAP in process and provide a green light for the
insurance fraud statutes ever, providing for death byclaimant to fabricate, inflate or exaggerate their
hanging as a penalty for conviction.claims. With GAP’s, like these, there’s
The sinking of the ship Adventure is typical. Thelittle wonder why insurers are seeing a rise in their
Adventure was purposely sunk off the coast ofclaims portfolio. The answer is a lot simpler than it
Brighton, England in 1902. The ship owners, Easterbyseems and corporate buy in is necessary. Proactive
and MacFarlane, purchased the Adventure at amethodologies and practices will assist a company
salvage auction (which like vehicle’s in modernidentify the motivations of individuals who are most
day schemes, was where the most scuttled shipslikely to direct an act of fraud towards the insurer or
were purchased). The ship was then repaired so thattheir employer.
it could earn the lowest passing grade ofBy being more proactive as apposed to reactive you
seaworthiness. The ship owners then, over-insuredhave a better chance of reducing your claims
the Adventure and told it’s Captain (Captainexposure, reduce reserves and better manage your
William J. Cotling)to sink it, so that they could collectservice providers while reducing the potential for
the insurance. As with many schemes, the characterslitigation, bad publicity and poor public perception and
committing the fraud were careless.at the same time ensuring compliance with your
To maintain structure within a company you need acompanies vision. In the war on insurance fraud,
solid foundation. Insurium delivers practical solutions tochasing the carrot will no longer yield the desired
bridging the GAP of escalating insurance claim costsresults. We need to stop looking at trying to remove
The Captain ordered an inexperienced mate to openthe opportunity and focus more on the motive, thus
the scuttle so that the ship would sink. The ship,understanding the root cause and effectively set
however, was in shallow water and was sinking soabout cost containment.
slowly that the Captain had to refuse assistance