Been Mis-Sold? Claim Yourself Or Pay Through the Nose

Many financial products have been mis-sold throughaccusations back in the face of the claims companies,
the years from endowment policies to accidentsaying that they often use template letters, which do
claims and, more recently, there have been banknot truly reflect the issues raised by the claimant.
charges. Lawyers make hefty profits along the wayConsequently the bank has to write back requesting
using their catchy slogans - no win; no fee - wheremore details of the case, which delays the whole
there is blame, there is a claim. But of course theyprocess. They would prefer the claimant to prepare
are not challenging the banks through the goodnesstheir own case, as the presence of third parties
of their hearts - Oh no; there is a fee to pay.confuses the issue.
Typically, they charge 25 per cent excluding VAT,Insurers and banks have had strained relationships
which is paid out of the compensation awarded. Youwith the majority of claim management companies
can save yourself these fees by preparing andover the years. A spokes person from the Abbey
submitting a claim yourself, and even if it is rejectedmaintains that most people can submit their own
you can approach the Financial Ombudsman Serviceclaims by contacting their insurer or bank direct. 30 to
(FOS). However, it is time consuming and you may40 per cent of your compensation is taken by the
think that a professional can submit a morecompany submitting the claim, often for doing very
persuasive claim and that you will be awarded morelittle, he said.
compensation at the end of the day.A Director of money supermarket, the price
There are many tricks of the trade which thecomparison site, said that the popularity of claims
untrained amateur claimant is not aware of. Rejectionmanagement companies handling PPI mis-selling could
letters issued by insurers and banks will give, whatlead to frivolous claims being submitted. They tend to
appear to be, plausible reasons for rejecting a claim.encourage claimants to proceed with claims which
However a specialist lawyer working for a claimshave very little substantial evidence to back them up,
company will identify these excuses and pursue thehe said. Claim management companies deny these
claim with renewed vigor. Their course of action mayaccusations, saying that they vet their claimants very
mean submitting the claim to the FOS and even if itcarefully and do not prepare frivolous or bogus claims.
is rejected an appeal can be lodged on behalf of theHe continued by saying that policyholders should not
claimant.dispense with their insurance when it was most
However the large number of claims being submittedneeded. They should ask themselves whether they
to the FOS has led to long delays of up to 10could do without their insurance if they became
months before a case is resolved. The situation isunemployed. Cases have been reported where
exacerbated by the way insurers and banks arepeople have canceled their PPI only to lose their jobs
dragging their feet.soon afterward, so it is prudent to try to keep your
A high street Building Society has thrown thesecover in place.