Banning Referral Fees for Personal Injury Claims - Will Insurance Brokers be Hit Hardest?

Copyright (c) 2010 Evolution Legalpreviously stated they would) as it is not a very
When LJ Jackson sat down to re-write the future ofcapitalist thing to do, but in any event they didn't
legal services, top of his list seemed to be thewant to ban them for those jolly good Solicitors, just
banning of referral fees and from all around it was 3for those awful, ambulance chasing CMC's!!!!! Cheers
cheers for Jackson. Well hang on LJ you and yourHenry, there's nothing like a free market economy to
gang are just plain wrong.ensure a level playing field is there?
Do you remember as far back as 1999 and theWhen the claims management market was regulated
newly written Access to Justice Act? If you can youin 2004, advertising for clients in hospitals was mostly
will recall that referral fees were banned at that point.abandoned by CMC's, only to be replaced at the
Hence convoluted business models (translation: backspeed of sound by Solicitors. Who are the ambulance
door referral fees), the rise of Claims Direct and Thechasers again?
Accident Group, severe malpractice (lawsuits stillThe snobocracy also appears closer to home. I was
ongoing?) and grossly inflated ATE premiums - all ofrecently having a few beers with some chaps from a
which led to satellite litigation, technical challenges andlaw firm to whom we refer work to (I wont name
an industry meltdown.names although I should!). Now this firm has
In 2004 sanity prevailed and there was a change toconservatively had 500 Personal injury referrals from
the Solicitors referral code, allowing referral fees tous in about 2 years and yes they pay us a fairly
be paid if handled in a transparent manner and thisstandard referral fee on a per case basis. It was all
resulted in the most stable period that the personalvery convivial until the 3rd or 4th pint was downed,
injury sector has enjoyed for a long time andwhen the sneering dismissiveness began.
increased access to justice for the man in the street."All you do is fill a form in and send it on to us" "We
This, coupled with the regulation of Accidentdo all the work" "All you do is sell claims on"
Management Companies resulted in a significantI was shocked to be honest.
watershed in the personal injury market.Not because these people seemed ignorant of how
If referral fees are banned once again, we willmuch work and marketing spend goes into to
undoubtedly see the return of back door payments,securing a contract with an Insurance Broker for
malpractice, legal challenges, back to the instability theexample, so that the phone rings and there is a client
market endured around the start of the Century.on the other end needing assistance after an
The future threatened is completely out of kilter withaccident. I already knew these were effectively
the modern commercial world and is effectively onehouse cats, sitting behind their desk being fed a
of legislation against market forces.steady diet of new clients each day, not knowing or
With the millions and millions of pounds spent bycaring how that new client magically appeared in front
CMC's and Solicitors on advertising, the public areof them.
more aware than ever of their rights and of theBut the level of malevolence in which their diatribe
availability of access to justice. Jackson believes hiswas delivered took me by surprise. These "Solicitors"
changes are about access to justice, but he has(they aren't actually qualified) were more than happy
monumentally failed to understand the market,to go and secure their pay rises on the back of
apparently looking upon CMC's as some sort ofbringing a commercial relationship to the Partners,
"parasitical leach" and let's face it, who cares whathappy to earn their bonuses on recovered legal
happens to them?costs, but actually they resent us as well.
In practice, referral fees paid by Solicitors to CMC'sBut what does this all mean for those outfits at the
merely form part of a marketing budget that theother end of the referral process, especially
Solicitor would no doubt have spent on some otherInsurance Brokers?
sort of marketing drive, such as advertising, but hasAre they going to lose their valuable revenue stream
chosen to spend the money with a CMC as there isof referral fees from their clients who have had
a some form of a guaranteed result - so who'snon-fault accidents? If so does anyone care if this
decision is it to spend the marketing budget with ansends a few of them out of business?
advertising agency or with a CMC?Well yes we care! CMC's and Insurance Brokers have
So what is a referral fee? Certain people seem toa good understanding of what is required for the
use the term to imply some sort of dishonesty, butperson who was actually involved in a non-fault
of course only when discussing those dastardlyaccident needs, the actual brass tacks of sitting on
CMC's!the side of the road with a car you cant drive and 2
It is also perplexing that the legal snobocracy fail toscreaming kids in the back.
realise that the year is 2010 and that Solicitors areThe Broker understands because that's his client and
business people and are not following some kind ofhe wants them to renew their policy with them next
vocation. Operating a law firm on the basis that theyear, so he wants the client to have an A1 level of
public will find you through membership in MASS orservice, after all claims are the shop window of the
APIL or by walking into your office on the HighInsurance process. The CMC understands because he
Street will result in failure, and the clever law firmswants the Broker to refer more clients to them, so
know this. But also please note: No-one is holding awho benefits? The client sat on the side of the road
gun to the head of the poor Solicitor, being bullied bywith 2 screaming kids that's who!
the awful CMC. They choose to pay a CMC becauseAt this point the Broker probably isn't thinking about
it is usually the most effective use of the marketingcommissions or referrals, just the service that the
buck.client gets and there is the crux of the matter. For all
Furthermore, why is it that CMC's are the parasites,the talk about referral fees being banned, yes some
but Solicitors are perceived as "seekers of truth andCMC's will probably go to the wall and maybe even a
justice"? The marketing model for acquiring newfew insurance brokers as well, but the real victims will
clients is broadly the same yet Conservative Shadowbe the policyholders who will have any choice
Justice Minister Henry Bellingham, recentlyremoved from their decision making process and be
commented that if the Tories got into power, theyleft with a massive call centre to talk to and try and
now don't want to ban referral fees (as theysort out a problem.