An Over-view of Credit Risk Management in the Banking Sector

Over the years, banks have been involved in ahave arrived on four main themes for a better credit
process of upgrading their risk managementrisk management.
capabilities. In doing so, the most important part ofThe first theme is concerned with a rapid evolution
upgrading has been the development of theof techniques to manage credit risk. This evolution of
methodologies, with introduction of more rigoroustechniques have been greatly supported by the
control practices, in measuring and managing risk.technological advancement made, with low cost
However, the by far the biggest risk faced by thecomputing being made available, making analyzing,
banks today, remains to be the credit risk, a riskmeasuring, and controlling credit risk in a far better
evolved through the dealings of the banks with theirway. This has allowed introducing a more rigorous
customers or counterparties. To site few examples,credit risk management system. However, despite
between the late 1980's and early 1990's, banks inthe thoughts of the utilization of the techniques
Australia have had aggregate loan losses of $25 billion.evolved, implementation of these practices still has a
In 1992, the banking sector experienced the firstlong way to go for the bulk of the banks. However,
ever negative return on equity, which this has neverit is expected that the pace at which the changes
happened before. There have been many otherare required to be introduced, will soon accelerate.
banks in the industrial countries, where losses reachedWith competition growing in the provision of financial
unprecedented levels.services, there is a need for the banking and financial
The analysis of credit risk was limited to reviews ofinstitutions to identify new and profitable business
individual loans, which the banks kept in their booksopportunities, and as such, it is inevitable that the
to maturity. The banks have stride hard to managepolicies on credit management have to change.
credit risk until early 1990s. The credit riskThe second theme considered that, the ability to
management today, involves both, loan reviews andmeasure, control, and manage credit risk, is likely to
portfolio analysis. With the advent of newbe the criteria as to how the banking sector grows in
technologies for buying and selling risks, the banksthe future. Widespread cross-subsidization has
have taken a course away from the traditionalintroduced significant negative impact on the net
book-and-hold lending practice. This has been done ininterest margin of all the banks, with a profitable
favour of a wider and active strategy that requiresbusiness supporting the cause of otherwise
the banks to analyse the risk in the best mix ofnon-profitable activities. The matter of
assets in the existing credit environment, marketcross-subsidization has been an intentional business
conditions, and business opportunities. The banksdecision by the management of the institutions.
have now found an opportunity to manage portfolioHowever, this has introduced problems in cash flow,
concentrations, maturities, and loan sizes, eliminatingwith the inability to accurately measure risk and
handling of the problem assets before they startreturn. With the banks getting on to improve on their
making losses.ability to measure risk and return on the activities, it
With the increased availability of financial instrumentsis inevitable that the characteristic of the internal
and activities, such as, loan syndications, loan trading,subsidies will become clearer.
credit derivatives, and creating securities, backed byThe third theme considered the interaction between
pools of assets (securitisation), the banks,the management and the improved credit risk
importantly, can be more active in management ofmeasurement. The theme also looked into the
risk. As an example, activities on trading in creditpossibility of using alternative risk measurement
derivatives (example - credit default swap) hastechniques within the regulatory environment. There
grown exceptionally over the last ten years, andwere certain issues that emerged.
presently stands at $18 trillion, in notional terns. As it1. The role of the supervision of a bank or a financial
stands now, the notional value of the credit defaultinstitution, in a more competitive and a much more
swap (a swap designed to transfer the creditadvanced financial environment.
exposure of fixed income products between parties)2. At what extent are the banks' risk supervisory
on many established corporate, exceeds the value ofefforts and their relevant policies, keeping pace with
trading in the primary debt securities, received fromthe initiatives and developments taking place in the
the same corporate. Loan syndications grew frommarket.
$700 billion to more than $2.5 trillion between 19903. The urgent need to align the supervisory
and 2005, and the same period saw a growth of loanmethodologies conceived, with the newly emerging
trading, which grew from less than $10 billion to morerisk measurement practices. In this issue, a general
than $160 billion. For the banks, securities pooled andsense of optimism exists, where the alignment
reconstituted from loans or other credit exposuresbetween the banking sector and the regulatory
(asset-backed securitisation), provided the means toauthority, regarding the approached towards the risk
reduce credit risk in their portfolios. This could bemanagement practices, would happen over time.
made possible by the sale of loans in the capitalHowever, there is an obstacle in meeting the
market. This became especially viable in case of loansobjective. The banks need to demonstrate with
on homes and commercial real estate.confidence, that they have in place well defined, and
The banks are now more equipped in handling creditwell tested rigorous risk management models, which
risk, in the allocation of its on-going credit allocationare completely integrated into their operational
activities. Some of the banks use a moresystem.
comprehensive credit risk management system, byThe fourth and the last theme that evolved, was the
critically analysing the credits, considering both, theneed to have a firm commitment from the banking
probability of default and the expected loss in thesector, relating to the management of risks in all its
possibility of a default. More sophisticated banks useforms, and the need to have a strong orientation of
the criteria given in Basel II accord in determiningthe credit management policy embedded within the
credit risk. In here the banks take credit decisions byculture of banking. Without such a firm commitment
increased expert judgment, using quantitative,coming from the higher levels in the banking sector,
model-based techniques. Banks, which used tothe alignment between the regulatory authorities and
sanction credits to individuals relying mainly on thethe banking institution, relating to strong credit
personal judgment of the loan sanctioning officers,management principles, is hard to achieve. It needs to
now use a more advanced method of srutinisation,be mentioned here that, today, unless banking
applying the statistical model to data, such as creditinstitutions do not take a firm committed step
scores of that individual. The lending activity of atowards a viable credit management system, and
bank has its credit risk invariably embedded, as oneintegrate the policies within their operational culture, it
finds in the market risk. It all such cases, banks needwill be difficult for the sector to meet any broader
to monitor risks by managing it efficiently, absorbingobjective, which importantly includes improved
the risk involved.shareholder returns.
Pricings of relevant risks are needed when-ever aIn the matter to be better aligned, there is a
bank moves in a lending contract with a corporatenecessity of accurate measure of the credit risk
borrower. New analytical tools now enable bankinginvolved in any transaction that the bank makes, and
organizations to quantify lending risks more precisely.such a measure is bound to alter the risk-taking
Through these tools, banks can estimate thebehavior, both, at the individual and at the institutional
measure of risk that it is taking on the fund, in orderlevels within the bank. So long we have been talking
to earn its risk-adjusted return on capital. This allowsabout the state-of-the-art technology and its use in
the bank to price the risk before originating the loan.rigorous credit risk modeling. With this, it should be
Banks often use internal debt rating, or third partyborne in mind that, improved measurement
systems, that uses market data to evaluate thetechniques are not automatically evolved without the
measure of risk involved, when lending to corporateapplication of proper judgment and experience;
issuing stocks.where-ever credit or other forms of risks are
The financial Pundits of the banking sector haveinvolved.prabirsenuk@yahoo.co.
discussed diverse range of subjects and issues, and