A Best Practices Approach to Core System Evaluation - Eliminating Decision Gridlock

When I hear the phrases "Data Processing" and "Bestsystem.
Practices", each has such a different connotation thanNow your are ready to select core application
it had ten years ago. Back then, the communitysystems for comparison. Try to limit your potential
banking industry wanted reasonably priced and fastvendors. Too many options could prevent you from
(comparatively speaking) customer recordmaking a decision. I have seen situations where a
accountability and transaction processing. The mostmanagement team compiles a significant amount of
significant issue was cost and whether or not suchinformation about particular application systems and
services were better controlled by implementing angets lost in the numbers. To make the situations
in-house computer operation or to outsource to aworse, the systems were all sales demonstrated on
data center. Costs, security and staffing issuessite, and each one was found to be comparable in its
typically drove this decision making process. In"ease of use, menu driven screens and management
today's environment, the management focus hasreporting options. Decision gridlock occurs, and with
shifted from processing accountability, which is noweach passing day the fear of selecting the wrong
assumed, to one regarding the need for profitabilityapplication system grows.
measurement, sales and marketing databases.Phase II - Vendor RFP Process
Because of increased competition for additionalYour initial contact with a potential vendor should not
market share, and the strategic objective of meetingbe to line up an on-site software demonstration.
existing customer needs, organizations today mustInstead, express your interest in their product and
rely more than ever on core application databases torequest an introduction meeting where a request for
give them reliable information about their products,proposal ("RFP") document will be distributed for
customers and service offices. The starting point tocompletion.
achieving such a strategic objective rests with the1.) Always start with the resume of the vendor.
product and core application service providers andEvaluate the vendor's background. Look for evidence
their systems that are selected.to support industry specialization, financial stability,
With the significant advances made regarding deliveryand service reputation.
systems such as real time transaction processing2.) Consider whether the vendor's products are being
tellers, telephone banking, debit and credit card POS,kept current with new technology trends. PC driven
ATMs, Internet banking, and remote deposit capture,client / server technology has become the standard
a core data processing and archiving system must bethe smaller (less than a $ billion in assets) financial
able to either accommodate a variety of third partyinstitutions.
vendor applications or come from a service vendor3.) The RFP will include a list of customer references .
that offers a suite of quality integrated applications. ISelect comparable size or larger customers to your
am going to present the method I have used withcompany for site visits and telephone interviewing.
great success in performing a current core applicationThe vendor will supply you with their best user sites,
vendor product and service review, comparison andwhich is really to your advantage. I have found that
selection process.these sites are open and candid in answering
Every four years, or approximately eighteen monthsquestions regarding the conversion process, software
prior to the service contract expiration, managementfeatures and functionality, user groups, vendor
should review the ability of their current data systemservice quality, software enhancements, and any
and service provider to meet their business needs. Ifother questions or concerns you may have.
a decision is made to investigate the feasibility of4.) After a well planned site visit, and a compliment
converting from the current core application systemof user bank conference call interviews, the next
and vendor to another, a formalized informationstep is to identify your vendor and core application
gathering process should occur.system finalists.
The following risk management process is beneficial in5.) Ideally, the two or three finalists should be
building a comprehensive and effective approach torequested to setup on a computer lab to allow your
support management's due diligence and decisionpersonnel to try out their software applications with
made.vendor help onsite at your location.
Phase I - Fact Gathering6.) Review and compare each finalist vendor's site
1.) Each key area of the company must bevisit and reference contact results, and their other
represented on the project team. This will help inRFP information, such as software features and
getting internal end user as well as customer needsfunctionality, third party partnerships and software
identified, keep all personnel in the loop, and minimizecompatibility. A diligent detailed analysis is necessary.
the risk of key issue omission. For example finance,Your goal is to be able to evaluate vendor proposals
compliance, deposit and technology operations,on an "apples to apples" basis.
branch network, loan production, personal banking,7.) A five year financial / investment analysis should
trust, marketing and executive areas should bethen be completed. The projections cover initial
represented on a system evaluation project team.conversion, ongoing operation costs, and investment
2.) Identify your current system computer hardware,options such as lease or purchase. Make sure the
ancillary processes such as item and documentvendors are quoting costs and capital investment
imaging, optical storage, system and applicationrequirements on the key items such as appropriate
software, personal computers, LANs,computer hardware, communication media, application
telecommunications, business resumption impact andsoftware, and maintenance options.
ongoing maintenance coverages.Phase III -Additional Best Practice Procedures
3.) Identify staff "internal customer" needs. AllowOther basic project issues that must be addressed
your personnel to openly indicate issues, both positiveas a part of any decision process include a risk
and negative, with the current systems and servicemanagement assessment, by critical risk factor,
provider. Issues such as vendor support, customerupdating of policies and procedures, business
and product data availability, information reportresumption needs, and staff education and training
flexibility, regulatory compliance needs, security,needs. In addition, physical site availability, physical and
manual vs. automated processes, and staff traininglogical security needs, operational internal controls,
must be identified.and staffing qualifications and size round out the
4.) Circulate a user PC and core system satisfactionremainder of the issues that must be addressed.
survey among key operating, customer service andPhase IV - Action Plans And Project Implementation
administration personnel. Perform follow-up interviewsSchedule
with selected individuals as necessary to confirm andAction plans and an implementation time line must be
expand on user needs and concerns identified.developed. Project sponsors (Those identified at the
5.) Compile statistical information regarding currentbeginning of this project) will work initially with the
system processing and storage capacity levels.vendor and the company's Technology Service
Examples of statistical information needed would be;department in documenting the chronological order of
average transaction volumes by account type, totalaction steps.
customer accounts and concentrations of multipleThis should help getting a more formalized apporach
account arrangements, and check clearings. Thisto supporting management's understanding of
information is critical in determining a pricing structurebusiness risk associated in the computer core
for a possible service bureau contract, or in acquiringsystems selection process or even what many
the appropriate computer hardware for an in-housebelieve is just a basic service renewal decision.