Best tips for risk management


Risk Management Information Systems design

Many risk managers have attempted to takeprice-earnings  ratio  (if publicly traded).
enterprise risk management (ERM) from a slick
consulting pitch to a practical managementBut given that the fundamental concepts of
system. But while ERM has helped many ofERM are not yet standardized, how could an
these professionals improve the strategicinformation system be designed from the
structure of their risk financing programs,ground up to support it? There are systems
few have fully achieved their ambitions. Onethat will, with the help of an analyst or
obstacle is the risk management informationactuary, allow risk managers to develop and
system (RMIS) built without an enterprisewiderun simulations of limited sets of risks.
orientation  toward  risk  data.Few, however, are designed to collect the
requisite  data  in  the  first  place.
For ERM programs to fulfill their potential,
the RMIS must focus on the risk financingBecause the insurer can predefine its risk
needs and processes of the entirethrough coverage definitions, exclusions,
company-i.e., reporting based on its specificretentions, deductibles and limits, these
financial and operational dynamics. It cannotrisk-limiting tools ultimately shape the
just tally the insurance companies' claimsstructure of today's RMIS. The risk manager,
and losses, as it does now. The system shouldhowever, cannot predefine risks and cannot
incorporate occurrence descriptions anddescribe every loss incident in terms of the
retained loss costs. It should support acoverage definitions intended to serve the
range of risk financing methods and theneeds of the insurer. Risk managers need an
financial analysis and reporting needs of theinformation structure that extends beyond the
risk  manager.insurers'  boundaries.
The recommendations that follow do notWithout standardized methods of management
describe a total ERM system. (Indeed,and analysis-and the technology to link the
building a separate ERM system would be likeinformation together-it is difficult to
constructing an independent six sigmaimplement ERM programs and information
program. Both must be built into othersystems. And the lack of information systems
enterprise processes to be effective.)to collect the loss experience data on
Rather, the recommendations that follow offernontraditional risks prevents the development
suggestions for the next steps in theof ERM procedures and methodologies. The
evolution of RMIS design, which will, ifabsence of each element hinders the evolution
adopted, make RMIS an integral part of ERMof  the  other.
practices.
Making ERM tractable will require a pioneer
ERM: Great Concept, Intractableeffort to develop the intellectual tools, the
Implementation?prerequisite data standards and information
systems that will let us achieve a real
Current professional and academic schools ofbreakthrough. Unfortunately, today's RMIS
thought dictate that ERM should achieveprovides no support for this kind of
proper allocation of risk capital acrossanalytics. And a lack of compelling market
three major risk categories-financial, creditdemand for enterprise risk assessment tools
and  operational  risk.has failed to induce IT entrepreneurs to
invest in the development of systems that
To this end, financial risk management issupport  ERM.
highly standardized. (This is possible
because of the extensive statistical dataA  Cost/Benefit  Analysis
available from large, open markets-equity,
bond, currency, derivative and commodityRisk managers already use elements of
trading systems-and the traders' interest inenterprisewide risk management to improve the
any analytical systems that provide aefficiency of risk spending. They make
competitive advantage.) Credit riskestimates of the scope and size of risks
management methods are less developed thanfacing the firm and thus allocate risk
those for financial risk management, but theyfinancing resources to bring the firm closer
are rapidly evolving. Operational risk is theto an optimal allocation of risk capital. The
least  developed.estimates start with risk mapping-plotting
the expected frequency and severity of each
Operational risk includes traditionalrisk (often displayed on an x-y coordinate
property/casualty risks, but it is also achart).
catch-all term for any risk that is not
financial- or credit-related. This includesThis is followed by scenario analysis, which
risks that are typically beyond the scope ofstress-tests the potential loss amounts. A
the traditional risk manager: businesslow probability (95 percentile) sequence of
control risks, corporate governance risks andadverse outcomes is developed from the chain
capital-intensive project risks. For these,of events following a major loss event. The
we lack statistical data and validatedtotal cost of the path associated with these
statistical methods to gauge the risks, andadverse  outcomes  is  then  calculated.
therefore few transfer markets have developed
for  them.For example, an earthquake damages a key
facility. This damage prevents delivery of
Though we have accurate data on the actuarialproducts, leading to disruption of contracts
dimensions of the frequency and severity ofand revenue loss. The lost revenue
many risks, operational risks often aresubsequently prevents wage increases, leading
multidimensional. Across an enterprise, risksto a labor union action, which further
have widely varying time horizons, degrees ofdisrupts production. Unreliable production
certainty and predictability. The nature ofdrives away potential new customers, further
an occurrence or event can vary widely (e.g.,reducing  future  sales.
discrete versus continuous occurrences,
speculative versus fortuitous outcomes). AndAn initial event often has ripple effects.
the correlations between risks typically areThe full cost of the loss extends far beyond
not  well  understood.the original damage to the facility.
Stress-testing or scenario analysis allows
Operational risks frequently derive fromthe firm to paint a more complete picture of
specialized functions where evaluating therisks, and to gauge the extent of the firm's
risks requires experience and expertiseexposure  to  catastrophic  events.
(e.g., information systems security,
environmental health and safety, contractualTo improve these analyses, the risk manager
risks). Within those business functions,needs to use RMIS to capture more data on the
specialists are often unwilling or unprepareddownstream effects of the initial loss event.
to conform their risk assessment methods to aInvisible costs could be calculated and
broader system. So while we may be able toincorporated into the overall risk picture.
get their participation in creatingThis might include the cost of overtime hours
assessments, the assessments cannot be easilyfor recall and remediation of a defective
aggregated with other loss probabilityproduct, lost sales due to bad publicity, or
distributions across the organization. Eventhe added cost of debt service due to a
if we are somehow able to aggregate riskdowngrade  of  the  firm's  financial rating.
assessments, the credibility of the results
may be questioned by the decision maker toUnlike financial risks or even most
whom it is presented because its method oftraditional property/casualty risks, there is
calculation is not clear, or requiredvirtually no statistical history on these
assumptions  are  disputed.kinds of costs. And yet, these are the costs
that most often threaten the viability of a
All of this reflects a lack of commonlycompany  in  the  wake  of  a  catastrophe.
understood and accepted ERM principles,
concepts and standards around which to buildWithout more advanced RMIS technology, risk
business  processes  and  systems.managers are limited to recording the
company's loss experience or collecting other
Where  Current  Generation  RMIS  Falls Shortfirms' case histories and using techniques
like  modeling  and  Monte Carlo simulations.
Current generation RMIS technology was
designed primarily to support insuranceSo, would the cost of developing a robust,
claims processing, and it does this quiteERM-supportive RMIS exceed its benefits? The
well. It organizes data in a way that mostcosts are immediate and tangible; the benefit
closely resembles the claims processingis difficult to estimate or demonstrate. Risk
systems used by insurance companies. Themanagers already struggle with how to explain
basic data record is for an insurance claim,the value of a loss that is prevented or
meaning that incidents must at least befinanced, particularly as measured by the net
potential insurance claims to be supported.present value of the improved capital
The data to fill these claims records areallocation. Even if the risk reduction is
normally provided by the insurer or thirdsignificant, it is a potential future
party administrator and loaded into thebenefit, not an assured, immediate expense
database by the RMIS provider. In otherreduction.
words, the system is primarily intended for
electronic storage and retrieval ofWhether the risk assessments from RMIS are
traditional insurer loss runs. This is greatlikely to lead to enough marginal benefits to
if you are running a claims department, butoffset the cost of data tracking and analysis
ERM  requires  much  more.depends on the company's risk profile. Large
firms stand to gain the most from refining
If the goal of ERM is to maximize the firm'sthe efficiency of risk capital allocation.
net income, then the fundamental premise ofBut as the cost of the computing tools needed
ERM is that risk decisions are capitalto collect data and perform the sophisticated
allocation decisions. Risk managers strive tomodeling and analyses continue to decrease,
assign the right amount of capital to a mixthe benefits grow for all organizations.
of risk financing or mitigation methods toUltimately, RMIS may pay for itself by
optimize results. To accomplish this, theyempowering an organization to avoid or
need to understand their company's riskeffectively finance that one catastrophic
tolerance in light of their organization'sloss that would otherwise slash the company's
cash flows, debt position, credit rating andfinancial results.



1 A B C D 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112