The Evolution of Project Management

Importance of Project Management is an importantand Scitor Corporation (1979). In the 1970's other
topic because all organisations, be they small or large,project management tools such as Material
at one time or other, are involved in implementingRequirements Planning (MRP) were also
new undertakings. These undertakings may beintroduced.Examples of projects undertaken during
diverse, such as, the development of a new productthis period and which influenced the development of
or service; the establishment of a new production linemodem project management as we know it today
in a manufacturing enterprise; a public relationsinclude: (a)Polaris missile project initiated in 1956 that
promotion campaign; or a major building programme.had the objective of delivering nuclear missiles carried
Whilst the 1980's were about quality and the 1990'sby submarines, known as Fleet Ballistic Missile for the
were all about globalisation, the 2000's are aboutU.S Navy. The project successfully launched its first
velocity. That is, to keep ahead of their competitors,Polaris missile in 1961; (b) Apollo project initiated in
organisations are continually faced with the1960 with the objective of sending man to the
development of complex products, services andmoon; and (c) E.I du Pont de Nemours chemical plant
processes with very short time-to-market windowsproject commencing in 1958, that had the objective
combined with the need for cross-functionalof building major chemical production plants across
expertise. In this scenario, project managementthe U.S.[3] 1980-1994: Production Centre Human
becomes a very important and powerful tool in theResources. The 1980s and 1990's are characterised
hands of organisations that understand its use andby the revolutionary development in the information
have the competencies to apply it.The developmentmanagement sector with the introduction of the
of project management capabilities in organisations,personal computer (PC) and associated computer
simultaneously with the application of informationcommunications networking facilities. This
management systems, allow enterprise teams todevelopment resulted in having low cost multitasking
work in partnership in defining plans and managingPCs that had high efficiency in managing and
take-to-market projects by synchronisingcontrolling complex project schedules. During this
team-oriented tasks, schedules, and resourceperiod low cost project management software for
allocations. This allows cross-functional teams toPCs became widely available that made project
create and share project information. However, this ismanagement techniques more easily
not sufficient, information management systemsaccessible.Examples of major projects undertaken
have the potential to allow project managementduring this period that illustrate the application of high
practices to take place in a real-time environment. Astechnology, and project management tools and
a consequence of this potential project managementpractices include: (a) England France Channel project,
proficiency, locally, nationally or globally dispersed1989 to1991. This project was an international project
users are able to concurrently view and interact withthat involved two governments, several financial
the same updated project information immediately,institutions, engineering construction companies, and
including project schedules, threaded discussions, andother various organisations from the two countries.
other relevant documentation. In this scenario theThe language, use of standard metrics, and other
term dispersed user takes on a wider meaning. It notcommunication differences needed to be closely
only includes the cross-functional management teamscoordinated; (b) Space Shuttle Challenger project,
but also experts drawn from the organisation's supply1983 to 1986. The disaster of the Challenger space
chain, and business partners.On a macro levelshuttle focused attention on risk management, group
organisations are motivated to implement projectdynamics, and quality management; and (c) xv
management techniques to ensure that theirCalgary Winter Olympic of 1988 which successfully
undertakings (small or major) are delivered on time,applied project management practices to event
within the cost budget and to the stipulated quality.management.[4] 1995-Present: Creating a New
On a micro level, project management combinedEnvironment. This period is dominated by the
with an appropriate information management systemdevelopments related to the internet that changed
has the objectives of: (a) reducing project overheaddramatically business practices in the mid 1990's. The
costs; (b) customising the project workplace to fitinternet has provided fast, interactive, and
the operational style of the project teams andcustomised new medium that allows people to
respective team members; (c) proactively informingbrowse, purchase, and track products and services
the executive management strata of the strategiconline instantly. This has resulted in making firms more
projects on a real-time basis; (d) ensuring thatproductive, more efficient, and more client oriented.
project team members share accurate, meaningfulFurthermore, many of today's project management
and timely project documents; and (e) ensuring thatsoftware have an internet connectivity feature. This
critical task deadlines are met. Whilst the motivationallows automatic uploading of data so that anyone
and objectives to apply project management inaround the globe with a standard browser can: (a)
organisations is commendable, they do not assureinput the most recent status of their assigned tasks;
project success.However, before discussing the(b) find out how the overall project is doing; (c) be
meaning and achievement of project success it isinformed of any delays or advances in the schedule;
appropriate at this stage to provide a brief history ofand (d) stay "in the loop" for their project role, while
project management.Brief History of Projectworking independently at a remote site.An example
Managementof a major project undertaken during this period is
Project management has been practiced forthe Year 2000 (Y2K) project. The Y2K Project,
thousands of years dating back to the Egyptianknown as the millennium bug referred to the problem
epoch, but it was in the mid-1950's that organisationsthat computers may not function correctly on
commenced applying formal project managementJanuary lst, 2000 at 12 AM. This was a global
tools and techniques to complex projects. Modernphenomenon and was highly problematic because
project management methods had their origins in tworesolving the problem at one's organisation did not
parallel but different problems of planning and controlguarantee immunity, since a breakdown in the
in projects in the United States. The first caseorganisation's supply chain could affect the
involved the U.S Navy which at that time wasorganisation's operating capability. Many organisations
concerned with the control of contracts for its Polarisset up a project office to control and comply with
Missile project. These contracts consisted oftheir stakeholders regarding the Y2K issue.
research, development work and manufacturing ofFurthermore, use of the Internet was common
parts that were unique and had never beenpractice that led to the establishment of the virtual
previously undertaken.This particular project wasproject office. The goal of this virtual project office
characterised by high uncertainty, since neither costwas: (a) to deliver uninterrupted turn-of-the-century;
nor time could be accurately estimated. Hence,(b) monitor Y2K project efforts; (c) provide
completion times were based on probabilities. Timecoordination; (d) develop a risk management plan; and
estimates were based on optimistic, pessimistic and(e) communicate Y2K compliance efforts with various
most likely. These three time scenarios werestakeholders. Thus, the virtual project office was a
mathematically assessed to determine the probablefocal point for all the project works, and it increased
completion date. This procedure was called programthe awareness and importance of risk management
evaluation review technique (PERT). Initially, the PERTpractices to numerous organisations.Why Project
technique did not take into consideration cost.Management?There is no doubt that organisations
However, the cost feature was later included usingtoday face more aggressive competition than in the
the same estimating approach as with time. Due topast and the business environment they operate in is
the three estimation scenarios, PERT was found (anda highly turbulent one. This scenario has increased the
still is) to be best suited for projects with a highneed for organisational accountability for the private
degree of uncertainty reflecting their level ofand public sectors, leading to a greater focus and
uniqueness. The second case, involved the privatedemand for operational effectiveness and
sector, namely, E.I du Pont de Nemours Company,efficiency.Effectiveness and efficiency may be
which had undertaken to construct major chemicalfacilitated through the introduction of best practices
plants in U.S. Unlike the Navy Polaris project, thesethat are able to optimise the management of
construction undertakings required accurate time andorganisational resources. It has been shown that
cost estimates. The methodology developed by thisoperations and projects are dissimilar with each
company was originally referred to as projectrequiring different management techniques. Hence, in
planning and scheduling (PPS). PPS required realistica project environment, project management can: (a)
estimates of cost and time, and is thus a moresupport the achievement of project and
definitive approach than PERT. The PPS techniqueorganisational goals; and (b) provide a greater
was later developed into the critical path methodassurance to stakeholders that resources are being
(CPM) that became very popular with themanaged effectively.Research by Roberts and
construction industry. During the 1960s and 1970s,Furlonger [2] in a study of information systems
both PERT and CPM increased their popularity withinprojects show that using a reasonably detailed
the private and public sectors. Defence Departmentsproject management methodology, as compared to a
of various countries, NASA, and large engineering andloose methodology, improves productivity by 20 to
construction companies world wide applied project30 percent. Furthermore, the use of a formalised
management principles and tools to manage largeproject management structure to projects can
budget, schedule-driven projects. The popularity infacilitate: (a) the clarification of project scope; (b)
the use of these project management tools duringagreement of objectives and goals; (c) identifying
this period coincided with the development ofresources needed; (d) ensuring accountability for
computers and the associated packages thatresults and performance; (e) and encouraging the
specialised in project management. However, initiallyproject team to focus on the final benefits to be
these computer packages were very costly andachieved. Moreover, the research indicates that
were executed only on mainframe or mini computers.85-90% of projects fail to deliver on time, on budget
The use of project management techniques in theand to the quality of performance expected. The
1980s was facilitated with the advent of the personalmajor causes identified for this situation include:
computer and associated low cost project(a) Lack of a valid business case justifying the
management software. Hence, during this period, theproject;
manufacturing and software development sectors(b) Objectives not properly defined and agreed;
commenced to adopt and implement sophisticated(c) Lack of communication and stakeholder
project management practices as well. By the 1990s,management;
project management theories, tools, and techniques(d) Outcomes and/or benefits not properly defined
were widely received by different industries andin measurable terms;
organisations.Four periods in the development of(e) Lack of quality control;
modern project management.[1] Prior to 1958: Craft(f) Poor estimation of duration and cost;
system to human relations. During this time, the(g) Inadequate definition and acceptance of roles
evolution of technology, such as, automobiles and(governance);
telecommunications shortened the project schedule.(h) Insufficient planning and coordination of
For instance, automobiles allowed effective resourceresources.It should be emphasised that the causes
allocation and mobility, whilst the telecommunicationfor the failure to deliver on time, on budget and to
system increased the speed of communication.the quality of performance expected could be
Furthermore, the job specification which later becameaddressed by the application of project management
the basis of developing the Work Breakdownpractices. Furthermore, the failure to deliver on time,
Structure (WBS) was widely used and Henry Gantton budget and to the quality of performance
invented the Gantt chart. Examples of projectsexpected does not necessarily mean that the project
undertaken during this period as supported bywas itself a failure. At this stage what is being
documented evidence include: (a) Building the Pacificdiscussed is the effectiveness and efficiency of
Railroad in 1850's; (b) Construction of the Hooverproject execution and not whether a project is a
Dam in 1931-1936, that employed approximatelysuccess or failure.Conclusion
5,200 workers and is still one of the highest gravityProject management should be viewed as a tool
dams in the U.S. generating about four billion kilowattthat helps organisations to execute designated
hours a year; and (c) The Manhattan Project inprojects effectively and efficiently. The use of this
1942-1945 that was the pioneer research andtool does not automatically guarantee project
development project for producing the atomic bomb,success. (project success will be discussed in a
involving 125,000 workers and costing nearly $2subsequent issue). However, in preparation for the
billion.[2] 1958-1979: Application of Managementnext issue, I would like you to think about the
Science. Significant technology advancement tookdistinction between project success and project
place between 1958 and 1979, such as, the firstmanagement success. This distinction will provide
automatic plain-paper copier by Xerox in 1959.further insight to the questions: Why are some
Between 1956 and 1958 several core projectprojects perceived as failures when they have met all
management tools including CPM and PERT werethe traditional standards of success, namely,
introduced. However, this period was characterisedcompleted on time, completed within budget, and
by the rapid development of computer technology.meeting all the technical specifications? Why are
The progression from the mainframe to thesome projects perceived to be successful when they
mini-computer in the 1970's made computershave failed to meet two important criteria that are
affordable to medium size companies. In 1975, Billtraditionally associated with success, namely, not
Gates and Paul Allen founded Microsoft. Furthermore,completed on time and not completed within
the evolution of computer technology facilitated thebudget?Sandro Azzopardi is a professional author
emergence of several project management softwarewho writes several articles on various subjects on his
companies, including, Artemis (1977), Oracle (1977),web site and local newspapers and magazines.