Are you aware that your hard disk drive is designed to fail?

According to Data Recovery Labs , External Hardimprove drive design and testing.
Disk Drives provide great flexible storage option andAlso, little difference in replacement rates between
security by providing a mobile back upoption, yet thisSCSI, FC and SATA drives, potentially an indication
advantage has dangerous twist to users.that disk-independent factors, such as operating
With storage capacity running in hundreds ofconditions, affect replacement rates more than
Gigabites, with high rates of data transfer, in additioncomponent specific factors. On the other hand, we
to the flexibility to plug the external drive to asee only one instance of a customer rejecting an
Laptop , Desktop, Server , Memory cards , Cameraentire population of disks as a bad batch, in this case
or iPod and sold at reasonable prices have increasedbecause of media error rates, and this instance
their popularity dramatically.involved SATA disks.
However, as the popularity of the external drivesTime between replacements, a proxy for time
containing backups and valuable data are increasinglybetween failure, is not well modelled by an
to accomodate the bigger Music & Photo filesexponential distribution and exhibits significant levels
emerging from Apple-Mac sysytems & Xserevers.of correlation, including autocorrelation and long-range
External drives are failing for no apparent reasons.dependence.
Majority of these failing drives are often of wellGenerally, inside the slick casings, often are poorly
known commercial brands such as Lacie, Freecomventilated or even not ventilated at all, external hard
and Omega and with the latest high capacity Maxtor,drives assemblers include the cheapest available
Seagate or Western Digital hard disk drives modelsdrives such as Maxtor & Seagate, combined with
with storage capacity exceeding 320Gb or evenbadly ventilated enclosure casing, the combination is
400Gb on a single drive.catastrophic for any given user, especially when the
According to a study of 100,000 drives conducted byhard disk drive is of high capacity containing crucial
Carnegie Mellon University, it is widely believed Hardback-up data
Disk Drive vendors manipulate the (MTTF) - meanFor any given Lacie with multiple drives, this can be a
time to failure. In fact The mean time to failureterrible experience with RAID drives and data in
(MTTF) of drives, according to their manufacturers,excess of 1 terabite. Often with RAID array external
vary from 1,000,000 to 1,500,000 hours, suggesting adrives, the drive failure are more frequent and the
nominal annual failure rate of at most 0.88%.damage is more extensive than single drives.
Whereas the study finds that "up to 13% observedAccording to Haj Majed Aziz of UniRecovery - RAID
on some systems.". This suggests that fieldData Recovery Labs "many of the 1 terabyte LaCie
replacement is a fairly different process than oneexternal drives contain 250Gb Maxtor IDE in RAID
might predict based on datasheet MTTF.array, inside badly ventilated enclosures, when used
It has also been established that failure rate is noton regular basis, especially within office environment,
constant with age, and that, rather than a significantthey are utter disaster."
infant mortality effect, evidently a significant earlyHitachi has unveiled a drive which has reached the
onset of wear-out degradation. That is, replacementnew heights of one terabyte (TB). Its drive looks like
rates in research data grew constantly with age, anany other, but uses perpendicular magnetic recording
effect often assumed not to set in until after ato make space for all that data.
nominal lifetime of 5 years. The study, also carefullyThe current technology generation of
point out that the study didn't necessarily track actualLRT-Longitudinal Recording Technology, which
drive failures, but cases in which a customer decidedrecords the bits laying horizontally, has been
a drive had failed and needed replacement. The studysuperseded by the recording of the bits standing
also explains that no vendor-specific failurevertically. However the cost is in the region of
information, and that his goal is not "choosing the$18,000 !
best and the worst vendors" but to help them to